Your Mail

ÚÑÈí

 

Counseling:

Ask the Scholar

|

Ask About Islam

|

Hajj & `Umrah

|

Cyber Counselor

|

Parenting Counselor

 

Search »

Advanced Search »

 

A Non-Muslim in Najaf: Absorbing the Scene

By Felicity Arbuthnot

26/05/2004

Imam Ali Mosque and possibly the world’s largest—and for many Shiites most sacred—cemetery in Najaf

A further attack on the Imam Ali Mosque and possibly the world’s largest—and for many Shiites most sacred—cemetery in Najaf, may well mark the beginning of the end for   Britain and America’s ill-conceived rampage in Iraq. George W. Bush announced he was going on a Crusade, and indeed the attacks are seen by Muslims worldwide as just that, an attack on Islam itself.

America and Israel are, for many, firmly entrenched in the frame.   Britain, by acceding to the US request to move troops north to Najaf from Basra, will further fuel another explosive situation. It was not lost on Iraqis that the British entered the south with many vehicles flying, not the usual British flag, but St George’s flag—the flag of the Crusaders.

In a rare example of something resembling insight, prime minister Blair’s government are said to be extremely concerned regarding implications of deploying troops to Najaf. However, supine to the last, they are more concerned, it would seem, about displeasing President Bush.

The importance of the Imam Ali Mosque in the region cannot be overstated. With Makkah and Madinah held in reverence by many as a place of pilgrimage, it is believed that Najaf was completed in 700 CE as the burial place of `Ali ibn Abi Talib (600–661 CE), after whom it is named, Prophet Muhammad’s cousin and son-in-law. Najaf is a holy city for the Shiites and one of their most important seats of religious instruction. Prior to the eight-year Iran-Iraq war, thousands of pilgrims flocked from Iran to the mosque. In the three years prior to last year’s invasion, which coincided with Iran and  Iraq building tentative, fragile bridges, they did so again.

Some years ago, a Jordanian friend said, “There is something you must not leave Iraq without seeing.” For a non-Muslim to enter the mosque itself is believed to defile its hallowed ground. She lent me an abbaya, taught me to walk without the head cover slipping off (which is actually harder than the graceful females who are used to it make it look), and covered from head to toe, we entered the mosque, whose golden domes and minarets can be seen 75 kilometers away.

It is seldom that one is literally struck dumb, almost unable to absorb a place, a scene. Karen Dabrowska (Iraq, Bradt Travel Guides 2002) quotes Gavin Young’s description: “gold tiles, darkened handsomely with age…pink, blue and yellow patterns of birds and flowers bedeck the archways…potentates, sultans, through time, have brought gifts of gold, jewelry, priceless objects, all donated in reverence.” Reverence is the key word and it was overwhelming, humbling, and chilling. I realized in an instant that if I was rumbled I really might not get out.

Women and men worship separately and I was surrounded—or should I say engulfed—by hundreds of black-clad, swaying worshipers pushing forward in a  gentle, purposeful wave to touch the great gold and black tomb of Imam Ali, or even to stretch the tip of one finger, or place their forehead against it. Reverence, passion, piety, humility, and complete, unquestioning belief. My fear was joined by deep shame at my intrusion into a situation I had simply failed to comprehend—a trust in the prophets, the afterlife—all beyond a stupid Western head. Yet to witness such faith was unique, utterly humbling, and unforgettable. Most people, at some time, ponder on what in their life they will remember as supremely significant on their death bed. For me, a dominant memory has to be the beauty, the passion, and the sanctity of the Imam Ali Mosque.

The shrine is Najaf’s genesis. Imam Ali left instructions that when he died, he should be tied to a camel, which must be left to roam free in the desert. Where the camel came to rest, the imam’s body was to be buried. The camel halted at what is now Najaf. (Dabrowska, as above.)

Outside in the superb mosaic courtyard, women sat in the sun with cauldrons of aromatic cooking—Arab style fast food—to give to the needy or sell for a pitifully small price to those with more. As the faithful left the interior of the mosque, they lingered, touching walls and pillars, with the now familiar gesture of the palm of the hand and touch of the fingers. When they left to pass into the street between the two great pillars that have now been reduced to rubble as a result of the bombing that killed Ayatollah Baqer Al-Hakim and many others last August, some rubbed their  foreheads against them until blood appeared. Oddly again, it seemed humbling rather than alien, and one had a brief glimpse of a world of total trust in the departed and certainty in the hereafter.

The murdered ayatollah, whose coffin reportedly contained just one hand and his turban, was not without enemies. Some people saw him as a bridge builder, and his brother is in the Coalition Provisional Authority, but for others he was a collaborator. He had been in  Iran since 1982 until he returned after the invasion. Many members of his family were murdered by Saddam’s regime. His Badr Brigade was formed to fight against Iraq in the Iran-Iraq war. Many analysts point to a power struggle among the prominent Shiite leaders as a motive.

The US administration blamed Saddam loyalists, Al-Qaeda, foreign terrorists, remnants of the Baath party, insurgents, and numerous other Islamic militants—many of whom have now pitched up in the former, fairly secular Iraq—and all are enraged at the invasion. (Strangely, the illegal western invaders squatting in Iraq’s palaces and public buildings, flogging off the country’s assets, and usurping its sovereignty do not see themselves as insurgents. Might, as always, it seems, is right.)

History is in danger of again repeating itself in Najaf

However, many informed commentators have made another analysis concerning attacks on Najaf, and given the nature of the Arab grapevine that can engulf the Arab
world, it is not looking good for the liberators. Given that regardless of all the turmoil of a blood-soaked region, the fact that the mosque has survived nearly unscathed throughout history is testimony to the esteem in which it is held. No Muslim would commit such an act, they say. American tactics in  Iraq and Israeli tactics in  Palestine are painfully similar—disappearing people, shooting them at road blocks, denying the injured passage to hospitals, smashing and demolishing homes, and torturing. Remembering both George W. Bush’s Crusade and the vow of  Israel to rule from the Nile to the Euphrates, the saying that only Americans or Israelis who would do this is fast gaining credence in the collective psyche.

Further reasoning is that  Britain and America saw Iraq as a fractious, divided country floating on a sea of oil, which would be relatively easy to rule. However, in actual fact, Iraq has virtually united itself against the occupiers. Thus, if an action results in different factions accusing each other and bringing about the divide that has not really happened, this would be greatly beneficial to the occupiers.

However, not only are August’s and this last incursion and damage to the mosque and cemetery an insult to Muslims worldwide. The Americans have made yet another fatal blunder in closing the official Iranian border, thereby denying Iranians the chance to pay their respects to the ayatollah and pray at this revered mosque. Given that hundreds of kilometers between Iraq and  Iraq cannot be policed, it is conceivable that thousands of furious Iranians flooded and are continuing to flood in through the marshes and other areas, pledging revenge.

Commentator Ramzi Baroud made the comparison between Iraq and the Israeli invasion of Lebanon. The war and slaughtering with far superior military power was swift, but raising an Israeli flag over  Beirut in 1982 was only the beginning. It is occupation itself that opens the door to terrorism.

History is in danger of again repeating itself in Najaf. Dabrowska relates a monitory tale: In 1918 the British tried to increase their control of Najaf and Captain Marshall was put in charge. He attempted to organize a police force outside the authority of the local sheikhs. Faced with a serious threat to their authority, the sheikhs rebelled and had  Marshall murdered. Just three years before, they had finally rid themselves of the Ottomans.

It is possible that amid the body parts and rubble, the blood, the severed dead of the Imam Ali Mosque, and now those slaughtered again in the holy city and ancient, evocative cemetery City of Rest, also lie the remains of America and  Britain’s  Iraq adventure - and the severed political remains of President George W. Bush and Prime Minister Blair.

Felicity Arbuthnot is a journalist and activist who has visited Iraq on numerous occasions since the 1991Gulf War. She has written and broadcast widely on Iraq, her coverage of which was nominated for several awards. She was also Senior Researcher for John Pilger’s award-winning documentary Paying the Price Killing the Children of Iraq.



ArtCulture Archive

Search Articles 

Send Mail

Related Links


News | Shari`ah | Health & Science | Muslim Affairs | Reading Islam | Family | Culture | Youth | Euro-Muslims

About Us | Speech of Sheikh Qaradawi | Contact Us | Advertise | Support IOL | Site Map