Your Mail

ÚŃČí

 

Counseling:

Ask the Scholar

|

Ask About Islam

|

Hajj & `Umrah

|

Cyber Counselor

|

Parenting Counselor

 

Search »

Advanced Search »

 

Ordinance Banning Religious Conversion In India Stirs Controversy

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalitha - Using conversions as a political weapon

IOL South Asia Correspondent

NEW DELHI, October 12 (IslamOnline) — An ordinance promulgated recently by government of the south Indian state of Tamil Nadu banning religious conversion has kicked up a controversy.

The ordinance, issued on October 5, bans conversion by “force, allurement or fraudulent means.” President of Tamil Nadu Bishop’s Council and Archbishop of Madras-Mylapore diocese, Dr Arul Das James said, “Christians are greatly shocked, distressed and disappointed” as the ordinance “casts unwarranted aspersions” on “peace-loving” people.

He said Christians did not believe in forcible conversion as all such conversion was invalid under Christian law. Apparently the state government had done it to please the anti-minority, hardline Hindu nationalist Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP) leading the coalition government at Centre. Tamil Nadu chief minister Ms Jayalalitha is facing a number of serious corruption cases in courts and a little helping hand from the central government will go a long way to alleviate her difficulties.

According to All India Christian Council general secretary John Dayal, conversion by force, allurement or fraudulent means is an “oxymoron” because in Christianity the only legally valid conversion is one undertaken with complete freedom.

The Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) described the ordinance as “mischievous,” meant to curry favor with the anti-minorities BJP.

In a statement issued here Thursday, October 10, IUML president GM Banatwala said, “the Tamil Nadu government is a victim of misleading propaganda.” The constitution of India allows freedom of conscience, belief and worship. Hence, religious conversion is not illegal per se.

However, over the years states have passed laws which make conversion under “threat or allurement" illegal. Governments, anti-minorities political parties and sectarian-minded police and administrative officials often harass people who convert to Islam or Christianity taking cover of such laws.

The fact, however, remains that no Christian or Muslim can even imagine to “threaten” somebody to embrace Islam or Christianity in a country under the total control of Hindus. The same is true of “allurement” as well, unless it is the “allurement” of heaven.

Most conversions occur due to the contradictions of the Hindu society which does not accord equal status to a large chunk of its family. Dalits (the so-called "untouchables"), tribals and many other "low caste" people are considered sub-humans who cannot has social relations with high caste Hindus or even enter their temples. Such outcasts represent around 40 percent of the population of the country.

As political expediency such outcasts are offered many special benefits and reservations in jobs and educational institutions. They lose these benefits automatically if they convert to a "foreign" religion (i.e., Islam and Christianity), which is in itself a sheer misuse of State resources for the benefit of the believers of a certain religion.

Most conversions in India are from Hindu and tribal animist faiths to Christianity as there is a full-fledged missionary infrastructure to propagate the Christian faith and to retain and absorb new converts in the Christian society. Islam comes a distant second as there is no organized missionary activity and no infrastructure or financial means to absorb new converts in the existing Muslim society.

Once in a while, entire villages convert to Christianity or Islam. In such cases it is easy for the converts as they already have a social group of their own, and all that they have to do is learn the ways of their new faith.

Such a mass conversion did occur in 1984 in Meenakshipuram village of Tamil Nadu, when 450 men, women and children of “low-caste” Hindus embraced Islam.

Such mass conversions generally worry the majority Hindus who fear that this would deplete their numbers ultimately and disempower them politically. Because of this fear, a counter-mobilization of Hindus began in 1984 which re-opened old wounds. The controversial Ram temple movement, seeking to build a Hindu temple by demolishing a historical mosque in the northern town of Ayodhya began in 1984 as a reaction to Meenakshipuram conversions.

Another mass conversion to Islam was reported last month from two villages in Haryana, neighboring New Delhi, by IslamOnline. The villagers who converted to Islam have complained that local officials have been harassing them to reconvert to Hinduism, which they are not prepared to do because as low-caste Hindus they had to suffer extraordinary humiliation at the hands of high-caste Hindus for generations.

Most conversions to Islam and Christianity are from low-caste Hindus, who are victims of oppression. Such conversions are perfectly legal, but the majority Hindus do not like it. The main Hindu nationalist organization, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) chief KS Sudarshan said here earlier this month that religious “conversion is the major source of conflict in this country.”

Minorities’ organizations and secular political parties contest this view of conversion. Some affiliates of RSS like Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) have declared that if conversions do not stop there will be a civil war in the country. Already they have unleashed a wave of persecution of Christians.

The curb on freedom of conscience imposed by the Tamil Nadu government has drawn flak from secular groups. Congress Party spokesman Jaipal Reddy said his party deplored “the ordinance imposing draconian curbs on fundamental religious freedoms. We are also distressed at the cloak and dagger manner in which it was issued.”

Attacking the ordinance, Communist Party of India national secretary D Raja said it was promulgated to please Hindu fundamentalist groups like RSS and parties like BJP. Raja asked the usual question: “ Who would decide allurement or coercion?” There is no answer to it, except that it is a weak tool to curb conversion, which is perfectly legal.

 

 

Yesterday's News

Search Articles 

 

 

News Archive :
Day:   Month: Year:   


Send Mail

Related Links


News | Shari`ah | Health & Science | Muslim Affairs | Reading Islam | Family | Culture | Youth | Euro-Muslims

About Us | Speech of Sheikh Qaradawi | Contact Us | Advertise | Support IOL | Site Map