 |
|
"It is some kind of a robbery on the funds of Arabs and Muslims," Rantisi charged
|
CAIRO,
August 23 (IslamOnline.net & News Agencies) – Palestinian
resistance movement Hamas downplayed Saturday, August 23, U.S.
President George W. Bush's decision to freeze the assets of six of its
top leaders and five Europe-based pro-Palestinians charities.
The
new American decision was also ridiculed by one of the five relief
organizations.
"Bush's
decision will have no effect on Hamas at all because the movement does
not have assets in the U.S., Europe or even Arab countries,"
Abdul Aziz Al-Rantisi, a senior Hamas leader, told Al-Arabiya news
channel.
"It
is some kind of a robbery on the funds of Arabs and Muslims (in the
U.S. and the European countries).
Rantissi
charged that the new decision by "Zionist" Bush is
tantamount to "a declaration of war on Islam."
Rantissi,
one of the six Hamas leaders on the Bush's list, maintained that one
day the
U.S. "will pay the price for its crimes against Muslims, who would
retrieve their stolen money."
In
a statement Friday, August 22, Bush said that "at my
direction" the Treasury Department has moved to block and freeze
the assets of the six top Hamas leaders.
They
were identified as Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, the spiritual leader of Hamas,
Rantissi, Mussa Abu Marzouk, Khalid Mishaal, Imad al-Alami, and Osama
Hamadan.
He
argued the move was prompted by the group’s claim of responsibility
for August 19 bus
bombing in occupied
Jerusalem, that killed 20 Israelis.
The
freeze also targets five non-governmental organizations that Bush
charged of providing "financial support to Hamas."
Two
of the organizations, the France-based the Committee for Palestinian
Charity and Aid (Comite de Bienfaisance et de Secours aux Palestiniens,
or CBSP)
and the Association de Secours Palestiniens (ASP) in Switzerland, have
been working in cooperation with more than a dozen relief
organizations in the West Bank and Gaza as well as in Palestinian
refugee camps in Jordan and Lebanon.
The
other three are INTERPAL in
Britain, the Palestinian Association in
Austria, and the Sanabil Association for Relief and Development, based in
Sidon
, Lebanon, according to Agence France-Presse (AFP).
The
U.S. Treasury Department put the five groups on a list of
"Specially Designated Global Terrorists."
'Ridiculous'
In
a quick reaction to the Bush move, the CBSP aid organization dismissed
the allegation as "ridiculous."
"We
have no direct or indirect link at all with Hamas," a spokesman
for CBSP, Youcef Benderbal, told AFP.
He
said the Paris-based CBSP, which started in 1990, was only active in
helping around 3,000 Palestinian orphans by raising donations.
"Everybody
knows us. If we represented any danger whatsoever, the French
authorities would have made us shut down," he said.
Asked
about the position of international law on confiscating and freezing
funds of individuals and NGOs, Dr. Ahmad Abul Wafa, a professor of
international law at
Cairo University, told IslamOnline.net Saturday that a country could freeze such funds
in conformity with its laws, but should not be part of a
discriminatory drive against particular groups of people.
The
funds of NGOs and rights groups should not be seized but respected,
given that they have been legally raised, he said.
The
expert asserted that such actions should not be directed at groups
simply because they are championing the defense of people suffering
under occupation.
He
also advised, in this respect, Arabs and Muslims to "learn the
lesson" and stop depositing their assets and funds in foreign
banks.
The
law expert further said that the charities which face assets freeze
could resort to the
U.S. litigation to challenge the decision.
Washington
has already frozen the assets of charities in the
U.S. that were tied to Hamas.
In
December 2001, the government froze the assets of the Dallas-based
Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, accusing it of acting
as a front for "terrorism."
This
was the first time the
U.S. has gone beyond acting against the military wing of Hamas and tried to
shut down the political wing of the movement that provides social
services and relief assistance, the New York Times reported.
Challenge
As
European officials remained reluctant to comment on the matter, the
Bush decision could face European opposition, it said.
Jonathan
Weiner, a senior State Department official under President Bill
Clinton who dealt with terrorist financing, said the freeze would be a
provocative challenge to the European governments.
"It
is laying down the gauntlet to the Europeans. Here for the first time
they have demanded to go after Hamas's political organization in Europe
," the Times quoted Weiner as saying.
However,
the daily quoted a senior administration official as saying that some
European countries had already signed on to the freeze.