 |
|
Blunkett came under severe attacks for not allowing enough debate over the ID cards introduction
|
LONDON,
April 25 (IslamOnline.net) – In a move to assure its Muslim
community introduction of the first ID cards in Britain since the
Second World War was not signaling them out, the government will
reportedly exempt Muslim women from showing their faces on the
controversial ID cards.
On
Monday, April 26, British Home Secretary, David Blunkett is to unveil
plans for a national pilot of biometric testing, the technology used
in ID cards, as part of a draft Bill to crack down on identity fraud,
according to the Independent daily Sunday, April 25.
“As
many as 10,000 volunteers will be recruited to have iris and facial
scans taken, as well as fingerprints, at the UK Passport Service
headquarters in London and at three further centers to be announced at
a later date.”
As
Blunkett came under severe attacks for not allowing enough debate over
the ID cards introduction, British officials made it clear that if
Muslim women do not want to reveal their faces in public, that would
be respected, reported the Observer Sunday.
“Instead
of a photograph, there would be an exemption for certain people, who
would only have to give fingerprint and iris-recognition data.
“Although
the exact type of information held on the card has still to be
finalized in negotiation with other industrialized nations, Home
Office sources made it clear that they backed the idea.”
A
source close to Blunkett was quoted by the Observer as saying, “We
have had constructive discussions with the Muslim community and want
to assure them we are sensitive to their points of view”.
“The
Home Secretary moved after representations from the Muslim Council of
Britain (MCB). Officials on the council told The Observer that
although they support the idea of identity cards they are concerned
that they could be used to persecute ethnic minorities.”
A
legal advisor to MCB told the Observer, “As we have seen with the
anti-terror laws and with stop and search, if powers are used in the
wrong way they can have the effect of singling out a community for no
good reason.
“We
are not against ID cards as such, but we want to ensure that they are
used properly.”
The
move, however, was set to come under attack from civil liberties
groups, who believe the proposals put more power in the hands of the
state and are likely to be technically unworkable, according to the
Observer.
“The
public have serious and understandable concerns that the Government
will simply not be able to handle the data they will be attempting to
collect,” Shami Chakrabarti, director of Liberty, told the daily.
The
Earl of Selborne, chairman of the Royal Society's influential science
in society committee, said that the public should be aware of the
dangers of ID cards, according to the paper.
“There
has been a lack of public debate and there is a very real danger that
we are sleepwalking into our technological future,” he said.
“The
public suggested that they should hold information that might be
useful in a medical emergency such as blood group or allergies.
“But
what if the cards also held data about our genetic disposition to
specific diseases, or revealed information about our lifestyles that
affect health, such as how much we are overweight or how much alcohol
we are drinking, updated daily.
“These
are technically possible in the future, so we should be discussing
whether they are desirable.”
According
to the Independent, Monday's draft Bill will set out government
proposals for a National Identity Register to hold details of all 60
million people in the UK.
“The
draft Bill will also include plans to make carrying false identity
papers a specific offence for the first time. Anyone found with forged
passports, driving licenses or other official ID will face up to 10
years in prison.”