|
Startling
Facts about the Demolition
of the Babri Mosque in India
Zafarul-Islam
Khan
Islamonline correspondent - India |
19/01/2002
|
 |
| BJP
and VHP leaders raising slogans after the mosque’s
demolition |
India's current Home
Minister L.K. Advani, who led the Hindu ultra-Nationalist Bharatiya
Janata Party (BJP) to power on the wave of the cry to build a 'Ram
Temple' at the site of the Babri Masjid, and personally oversaw its
demolition on 6 December 1992, has been claiming all these years
that he is not responsible for the demolition. He and his camp
followers made many wild claims during these past nine years: That
the central government of Narasimha Rao is responsible for the
demolition; that the rivalry between certain leaders of the
parliament led to the demolition; that the Pakistan military
intelligence (ISI) people provoked the mob to go on rampage and that
Advani was in fact exhorting the masses not to demolish it.
Recorded evidence shows that this man led the symbolic religious
caravan, Rath Yatra, across the country, leaving behind a trail of
anti-Muslim riots, and killing over 3000 Muslims and burning and
looting their properties in many states. On the day of the
mosque’s destruction, Advani was sitting on a platform from where
slogans like 'ek dhakka aur do, Babri Masjid tod do' (give another
push, demolish the Babri Mosque) were being raised.
After decades in which
the BJP continued to hold two parliamentary seats, that dubious
movement led to the increase in the number of seats to almost 180
(out of a total of 545). For the last three years, this party has
been ruling India, heading a coalition of discordant parties. Headed
by Justice Liberhan, a judicial inquiry has been in action in the
Babri demolition case since December 16, 1992. BJP members have
grossly misused their platform to air their biases, misinformation
and lies. Within the government, they have tried to change the
secular outlook of the state and have been trying to effect changes
in every department and field of life, especially culture and
education.
In previous appearances before the Liberhan Commission, Advani has
uttered many conflicting remarks: Once he claimed that the
demolition was the most agonizing moment of his life, in another
sitting he said the Ram Temple movement was a source of pride for
Hindus. In yet another appearance he confessed that the Babri
demolition helped his party consolidate its vote bank.
All along, the message has been that the party was not responsible
for the demolition. Wild claims have been made by BJP, VHP and
Bajrang Dal members since the demolition. The fact is that the
demolition was a culmination of a decade-long movement by
politicians with an unpopular political stream: It was based on the
assumption that by raising the issue of the Ram Temple, they can
mobilize Hindu voters for their political party. Throughout this
process they achieved their goal, but they also polarized Indian
society. Even if this ilk somehow disappears from the scene, India
will need decades to undo the hatred and disharmony created by this
movement.
Recently, a source from within Advani's own household has unveiled
the truth about his misinformation campaign. Gauri Advani, his
daughter-in-law said, in a statement to the Liberhan Commission,
that her father-in-law conspired with BJP leader Vinay Katiyar, the
then leader of the militant youth outfit, Bajrang Dal, to demolish
the Babri Masjid. “Iska kaam kar do.… Kya, Babri Masjid ka
kalank nahin mit sakta?” [Finish this off.. Is the blot of the
Babri Mosque irremovable?'] Gauri alleged that Advani asked Katiyar
in a meeting just before leaving for the Rath Yatra.
In a testimony filed before the Liberhan Commission, Gauri said that
she was present at the meeting when the two leaders allegedly
discussed plans for the Babri demolition. Gauri requested that she
be made a witness before the commission to tell the truth about the
demolition. She called Mr LK Advani's statement before the
Commission as “nothing but a bundle of lies based upon concocted
and false facts.”
In her 10-page long testimony, the estranged daughter-in-law decried
Advani’s statement before the commission that he was anguished by
the Babri demolition and that he had nothing to do with it.
Currently a practicing solicitor in London, Gauri was Advani’s
special assistant from November 1989 until her marriage to Jayant in
October 1991. She is now seeking divorce from Advani’s son Jayant.
Gauri said that, as Advani’s special assistant, she had looked
after his New Delhi parliamentary constituency from where he
contested and won election to Parliament. “[Gauri] at that time
had deep faith in the ideology which Mr. L.K. Advani used to
propagate, and she took whatever Advani would tell her as gospel
truth,” Gauri said in the testimony.
According to Gauri, on or around November 28, 1991, an application
was introduced to the Supreme Court seeking permission to carry out
a symbolic Kar Seva (voluntary religious service) in Ayodhya.
Anticipating favorable orders from the Supreme Court, Advani decided
to start another Rath Yatra from Varanasi to mobilize Kar Sevaks
(volunteers). Gauri said that she and Advani’s wife Kamala
accompanied him to Lucknow on the morning of November 30, 1992, when
all of them left for Varanasi.
‘‘Before the start of the Rath Yatra (on December 1, 1992), Mr.
Vinay Katiar came to meet Mr. L.K. Advani. The applicant [Gauri] was
also present at this meeting. It was in this meeting that Mr. L.K.
Advani and Mr. Vinay Katiyar, in the presence of the applicant,
conspired to demolish the Babri mosque. Mr. L.K. Advani told Mr.
Vinay Katiyar that the ultimate aim of the Rath Yatra… is not only
to do Kar Seva and appease Hindu sentiment but also to garner votes
and come to power at the Centre,’’ Gauri stressed in her
application. She alleged that Advani told Katiyar that, ‘‘the
movement to build the Ram Temple at Babri mosque had to be taken to
its logical end, i.e., coming to power at the Centre, and that would
not be possible without demolishing the Babri mosque as that will
unite the Hindu vote bank in favour of the BJP.’’
Gauri went on to say, ‘‘the applicant remembers that… Mr.
Vinay Katiyar looked at the applicant and then said to Mr. Advani
that, ‘Hum to aapke aadesh ka intizaar kar rahen hain aur agar aap
bole to masjid ka namo-nishaan mita de' [We are waiting for your
permission and if you say we will erase every trace of the mosuqe].
Mr. Advani at that time smiled and then said, ‘To intizaar kis
baat ka? Kaam kar do, ghulaami ke nishaan kab tak rahenge. Masjid ko
dhawasth karke dikhao – sahi samay aa gaya hai' [So what you are
waiting for? Do the job. How long this symbol of slavery will
remain. Destroy the mosque. Right time has come].”
Gauri claimed she was not surprised at Advani’s
‘‘outpourings’’ as ‘‘even at home the family members
used to say that the Kar Seva in Ayodhya would not remain restricted
to Bhajan [religious songs] or Kirtan [religious music]. It was
common during discussions at home that the BJP can only come to
power by playing the 'religion card,'” she said. Gauri said that
after the Babri demolition, Advani exulted on returning home:
‘‘Jo karne gaye the, woh kar aye” [We did what we had gone to
do].
Gauri Advani also disclosed that during and after the demolition of
the Babri mosque, L.K. Advani got various silver gifts in the form
of Hindu gods and goddesses, swords and bricks from Hindu
individuals, associations and temples. Since Advani and his family
members did not follow Hinduism, all these silver items/gifts were
melted in Bombay (with the help of Sarla Advani, sister of Kamla
Advani who lives in Bombay) to make silver utensils and cutlery
items that are now used in the Advani household. L.K. Advani used to
claim at home that he does not believe in Hindu gods and goddesses,
and that keeping them at home serves no useful purpose. He
therefore, decided to melt these gift items to use the silver to
make utensils and cutlery items.
The BJP has refused to comment on Gauri’s testimony and the claims
made therein. Senior party leader J.P. Mathur said, ‘‘We have
not seen it. When we read it, we will talk about it.”

|