I
loved Said. For, as Nietzsche puts it;
“I
love him which [sic] makes of
his virtue his inclination and his destiny: for thus for his virtue's sake he
wills either to live or to cease to live.
…
I love him which [sic] strews
golden words before his deeds and performs yet more than he promises: for seeks
his own down-going.
…
I love him whose soul is deep even for wounding and whom a slight matter may
destroy: for he gladly goes over the bridge.
I
love him whose soul is over-full so that he forgets himself, and all things are
within him: thus all things become his downfall.
I
love him which is a free mind of a free heart: for his head is but the bowels of
his heart, but his heart him to destruction.
I
love all them which are as heavy rain-drops falling one by one from the dark
cloud that lowers over mankind: they herald the coming lightning, and they
perish as heralds.” (Nietzsche, Thus
Spoke Zarathustra).
Said
existed in the minds of countless Arabs and Muslims not as an author, neither
was he just an academic. He was present as an ethos. Where human life is that of
the self in a world of thought, a blind of anecdote and exegesis, Said was a
grand part of many of our worlds. If there is anything that he stood tall for it
was, no doubt, dignity, coming from an unapologetic and enthusiastic
‘human’. If there is a lesson we should learn from his life-despite many of
such lessons-it is to never accept any less than the upper grounds, moral,
intellectual, and ‘human’. He left us all orphaned and near to the ground.
As
it is known about him, he was against the idealization of any figure, even
himself. But what can we do if the ‘cause’ itself, with all its insufferable
weight, was lifted on his shoulders and rooted itself into his purposefulness
and intellect? And then he was transformed to be an expression of the cause
itself? What do you do if the man and cause become on a par? He structured the
epistemology of Palestinian struggle for liberation, of the Arab and Muslim
struggle against the vehement tides in seas of arrogance and ignorance, of the
all human intellectual quest. His human generosity is stretched out to all,
academia, literature, art, music, activism, political struggle, family and as a
many great thinkers, to his friends.
He
squeezed a vision of a dignified ‘present’ to Palestine, out of a history
(disfigured by Zionist myths and viciousness) and a future (suffocating from
uncertainty and apathy), that was his individual life. He pressured both the
‘space’ and ‘time’ of the relativity of his life next to the impossible.
Exile, Leukemia, polemics, occupation, 9/11, Oslo, the existential tragedy of
his fellow Palestinians-all that could not put out his always-ignited fire.
Still, he died without seeing his most essential dream realized; the liberation
of Palestine. He truly stood his own ground and flew with the power of his mind
and action to the space of the free. His life was dedicated to the
‘Palestinian memory’ which structured, despite all the storms of falsehoods
trying to vacuum Palestine out of the world. His actions and struggles for
liberation are better expressed here:
“…
This is the use of memory:
For
liberation-not less of love but expanding
Of
Love beyond desire, and so liberation
From
the future as well as the past.
Thus,
Love of a country
Begins
as attachment to our own field of action
And
comes to find that action of little importance
Through
never indifferent. History maybe servitude,
History
maybe freedom. See, now they vanish,
The
faces and places, with the self which, as it could,
Loved
them
To
become renewed transfigured, in another pattern.” (T. S. Eliot, from Little
Gidding)
Born
in Jerusalem, yet Christian; in Cairo, yet a Palestinian; an American, yet an
Arab; the story of being out of ‘place’. Against American triumphalism and
Zionist pathological propagandas, he was a sun of integrity. Although a
Palestinian, he uncompromisingly stood against Arafat and his absolutism, the
dishonor of Oslo, and the “suicide” bombs, an issue which he was always
against. Still, with his eyes fixed on the danger of Zionist immorality, he
always denounced the Holocaust.
I
met the man once a few months ago. It was a series of three lectures, and of all
the famous people I met, he was the only figure I can think of who was not less
than expected and somehow idealized. He looked drained by leukemia. His eyes set
very close to each other, leaving a narrow space for a long old nose, showed
both the exhaustion of leukemia and the shrewdness of his mind. His hands, big
with distinctive knuckles, especially when he used to hold his pen, were always
in the air, not excessively though, showing both the mannerism of a modestly
giant intellectual mind and the artistic strokes of a gifted pianist. The
projection of his deep voice was effortlessly mesmerizing, nay hypnotizing.
Away
from all that, that power of the poetic which he mastered was truly genius. This
small excerpt from the last paragraph from his autobiography, Out of Place,
which a friend showed me and got me to read, is written with great human
delicacy and command. This is a taste of his thoughtful night and a graceful
portrayal of insomnia. Our worlds are darker without him and longer are our
nights (emphasis added):
“Sleeplessness
for me is a cherished state to be desired at almost any cost: there is
nothing for me as invigorating as immediately shedding the shadowy
half-consciousness of a night's loss, than the early morning, reacquainting
myself with or resuming what I might have lost completely few hours earlier.
I occasionally experience myself as a cluster of flowing currents. I
prefer this idea of a solid self, the identity to which so many attach so
much significance. These currents, like the theme of one's life, flow
along during the waking hours, and at their best, they require no
reconciling, no harmonizing. They are "off" and may be out place,
but at least they are always in motion, in time, in place, in the form of
all kinds of strange combinations moving about, not necessarily forward,
sometimes against each other, the contrapuntally yet without one central
theme. A form of freedom, I'd like to think, even if I am far from being
totally convinced that it is. That skepticism too is one of the themes I
particularly want to hold on to. With so many dissonances in my life I have
learned actually to prefer being not quite right and out of place.”
(Said, Out of Place)
Tarek
A. Ghanem
is a staff writer and editor of the Contemporary Issues page of
IslamOnline.net. He is specialized in comparative politics and contemporary
Islam. You can reach him at t.ghanem@islam-online.net