VIENNA,
October 1 (IslamOnline & News Agencies) - Amidst U.S. calls for a
delay of any mission to Iraq, talks on new U.N. arms inspections resumed
in Vienna on Tuesday, October 1, after a preparatory meeting between the
two sides.
“We
have so much to talk about,” chief U.N. weapons inspector Hans Blix
told reporters on his way into the second day of talks, aimed at a deal
for U.N. inspectors to return to Iraq after a four-year hiatus, reported
Agence France-Presse (AFP).
U.S.
Secretary of State Colin Powell said Monday that U.N. inspectors should
delay any mission to Iraq until the U.N. Security Council finishes
deliberations on a possible new resolution that would tighten up the
inspection regime.
But
Blix said earlier Tuesday that his orders came from the U.N. top
decision-making body and not Washington. “I am asked by the Security
Council to do this job and I do it,” said Blix.
Meanwhile,
Baghdad accused the United States Tuesday of trying to derail the
resumption of U.N. arms monitoring as a prelude to an attack on Iraq,
AFP reported.
With
UN officials reporting progress in the first day of talks with Iraq in
Vienna, Al-Rafidain, a weekly run by President Saddam Hussein’s
elder son Uday, said it expected the inspectors to fly into Baghdad on
October 16.
“There
is no need for a new resolution since the Security Council already
issued Resolution 1284 (in December 1999) that created UNMOVIC,” the
U.N. Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission, the official
told AFP, requesting anonymity.
The
administration of U.S. President George W. Bush turned up the heat on
the inspectors “as soon as a positive step was taken in the direction
of implementing their mandate,” said Abderrazzak al-Dulaimi, dean of
the information faculty at Baghdad University.
“Iraq
realizes that the Bush administration will try to obstruct the
inspectors’ mission ... but it (Iraq) will handle the issue in such a
way as to thwart Washington's hostile plans,” he told AFP.
“We
are moving forward with our discussions under our mandate and will of
course take into account any directions from the Security Council,”
said spokeswoman Melissa Fleming of the International Atomic Energy
Agency (IAEA).
“We
are moving forward with our business. We have to proceed as if we will
return,” she said.
The
Iraqis were “trying their best ... to expedite our requirements for
effective inspections,” Blix said after the first of two days of talks
in Vienna.
Al-Rafidain,
declaring that Iraq had “completed preparations to receive the
inspectors,” quoted a senior Iraqi arms expert as saying the Vienna
talks were proceeding “in a very positive way at the moment.”
Blix
“told the Iraqi side he was determined to close the outstanding files
(on prohibited weapons) as quickly as possible ... as a prelude to
asking the Security Council to fulfill its own obligations under
Resolution 687, chiefly the lifting of the embargo” in force against
Iraq for 12 years, it said.
But
the Bush administration will try to foil the talks as part of the
“psychological war” it has been waging against Iraq to set the stage
for an attack on the country, Al-Rafidain said.
Will
Blix “be able to resist pressures, or will he, like his predecessors,
become a tool in the hands of the United States, which wants to block
inspections so as to perpetuate the UN embargo on Iraq?” the weekly
wondered.
If
the chief arms inspector means what he says, then six months should be
enough to finish the work started by his predecessors, it added