COPENHAGEN,
October 8 (IslamOnline & News Agencies) - The Danish security
company Group 4 Falck said Tuesday, October 8, it would cease
surveillance operations in Jewish settlements in the West Bank in line
with U.N. guidelines calling for a halt to the Israeli occupation of
Palestinian territory.
“We
have chosen to drop these activities because we do not want to support a
situation that contravenes U.N. recommendations and international
law,” company spokesman Niels Pedersen told Agence France-Press (AFP).
The
firm, the world’s second largest security services provider, has
carried out security work in the occupied Palestinian territories since
March when it acquired a 50 percent stake in Hashmira Company,
Israel’s largest security group.
The
Danish firm’s activity in the Jewish settlements through Hashmira
sparked stiff opposition at home among the media, opposition parties and
human rights groups.
Pedersen
said the firm had asked Hashmira to draw up a plan to dismantle all
surveillance activities in the West Bank to be ready for the next board
meeting in three weeks’ time.
The
company took the decision after taking legal advice and consulting the
Danish foreign ministry, Pedersen said.
He
added that the company would pull around 100 staff out of the West Bank
in a way that would not threaten the settler population it was paid to
protect.
The
company insisted that it had acted in good faith when it acquired its
stake in Hashmira “whose operations in the West Bank represent just
one percent of total activity,” Pedersen said.
“These
activities are purely defensive and preventive in nature,” he said
adding that staff from Group 4 Falck never worked on Israeli police or
army surveillance missions but were hired directly by settlers.
The
Palestinian intifada, or uprising against Israeli occupation, has lasted
over two years and claimed more than 2,500 mostly Palestinian lives.
Petersen
said the fact that the company operates in settlements could be
interpreted as suggesting Falck did not respect U.N. resolutions.
“We
can’t live with that doubt; that’s why we are leaving,” he said.
Falck
has operations in 80 countries around the world.
The
international community considers all the permanent settlements in the
occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip, housing some 200,000 people, to be
illegal.
They
are one of the main points of contention between the Israelis and the
Hashmira has been asked to present a plan for phasing out all activities
in the West Bank at a board meeting on October 28.
About
200 Jewish colonial settlements have been set up in the West Bank and
Gaza Strip since Israel seized the territories in the 1967 Middle East
war.
All
the settlements, according to U.N. resolutions are considered illegal.
Some
60 so-called “rogue” outposts, often just a cluster of caravans,
have popped up in recent years.
The
settlers believe that they have a biblical right to the land.
According
to a report issued Sunday, June 30, by Israeli peace group “Peace
Now”, ever since Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon came into power
in February 2001, Jewish settlers in the West Bank have built 44 new
sites.
“Nine
of these new sites were erected in the period March-June 2002,” the
Peace Now report said. It added that “the term ‘outposts’ is
misleading.
“To
all intents and purposes these sites are new settlements: they have
independent infrastructures and are spread over new pieces of land.”
Peace
Now spokesman Tzali Reshef said in a statement that the Israeli
government “is systematically violating its commitment to the Israeli
public as written in the coalition agreement that formed the basis for
the national unity government.”
“The
creation of new settlements harms Israel’s security and unnecessarily
endangers still more [Israeli] soldiers and citizens,” he said.
For
more than thirty years, the creation of Jewish settlements has been a
central component of Israel’s effort to consolidate control over the
Gaza Strip and the West Bank, including occupied East Jerusalem.
Israeli
settlement construction has served not only to facilitate territorial
acquisition and to justify the continuing presence of Israeli armed
forces on Palestinian lands, but also to limit the territorial
contiguity of areas populated by Palestinians and thereby to preclude
the establishment of a viable independent Palestinian state.
Israel’s
settlement policy and practices clearly contravene international law.
Article 49, paragraph 6 of the Fourth Geneva Convention states that
“the occupying power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own
civilian population into the territories it occupies.”
Moreover,
the confiscation of land for settlement construction is in violation of
the rules contained in the 1907 Hague Regulations protecting public and
private property in occupied territory.
Settlement
activity is also fundamentally incompatible with the concept of a
“just and lasting peace” called for in United Nations Security
Council Resolution 242.
In
Resolution 465, which was unanimously adopted, the Security Council made
clear that “Israel’s policy and practices of settling parts of its
population and new immigrants” in the occupied territories not only
violate the Fourth Geneva Convention, but also constitute a serious
obstruction to achieving a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the
Middle East.”
The
Security Council called upon Israel to “dismantle the existing
settlements and in particular to cease, on an urgent basis, the
establishment, construction of planning of settlements in the Arab
territories occupied since 1967, including Jerusalem.”