On
July 22, US forces in Iraq reported that they had killed Uday and Qusay Saddam Hussein, sons of
Iraqi President Hussein. Two other Iraqis were killed in the six-hour shootout at the Mosul
home of someone thought to be a Hussein relative. One Iraqi civilian was killed under suspicious
circumstances outside the home; CNN reported that he was caught in a crossfire, but Iraqi sources
told Arab news media that the Iraqi was protesting against the storming of the Mosul
home and was shot dead by US forces.
North
American media could not contain their glee as they announced “a giant victory in the war against
terrorism.” Iraq “experts” predicted that this would quell Iraqi resistance. Their words
couldn’t have proven more dire; 14 US military servicemen where killed in Mosul within
five days of the killing of Uday and Qusay.
A
few journalists working in Iraq cautioned that while the killings of the two Hussein sons were a
blow to Saddam himself, it was unlikely to affect Iraqi resistance. (Hussein himself broadcasted an
audio tape in which he praised his sons for their “martyrdom” and urged other Iraqis to fight to
the end.) Analysts and terrorism experts argued on popular news talk shows, but in the midst of all
the ranting the voice of Iraqis was deafened, locked out of the debate.
Most
Iraqis and Arabs seem to agree on one thing, however – the US erred in killing the Hussein
brothers. The Hussein brothers should have been apprehended, jailed, and put on trial by Iraqis.
“Yes,
they were criminals... but they were Iraqis... They should have answered to other Iraqis for
their crimes.” |
|
“Yes,
they were criminals, yes they killed our people, but they were Iraqis nonetheless, and they should
have answered to other Iraqis for their crimes,” said one disgruntled Iraqi dissident who
identified himself only as Abu Kadhim.
No
one who has ever lived or visited Iraq will dispute the fact that the Hussein brothers were fierce,
ruthless, merciless, and vindictive. Nor will they dispute the fact that Uday Hussein, who as a
child had been forced to watch executions of his father’s political opponents, had the reputation
of a maniacal rapist, murderer, and sadist.
Qusay
Hussein, on the other hand, removed himself from the limelight but is said to have had a flair for
killing anti-Saddam elements. He was known to be swift and deadly.
Both
have significant amounts of Iraqi blood on their hands.
Will
Iraqis mourn the death of the two? Here’s the shocker – yes, very few will. However, many more
will be relieved to know that two icons of brutality have been done away with.
Nevertheless,
while Iraqis may feel relief that former echelons of the Saddam regime are no longer a threat, every
single Iraqi I have spoken with in the past three days has expressed a deep loathing, resentment,
and outright rejection of how US troops conducted themselves in killing Uday and Qusay. This leads
to a long list of US blundering:
1) The
US had no right to kill either Uday or Qusay. Both committed crimes against the Iraqi people and
plundered national wealth. As such their crimes were not against the US and therefore it is illegal,
as seen through Iraqi eyes, that the US dispenses justice. By killing the Hussein brothers, the US
has effectively bulldozed over Iraqi grievances and calls for justice. This leads the Iraqis to
understand that the US does what it wills, that its presence in Iraq has little to nothing to do
with justice and freedom for the Iraqi people. Iraqis wanted to bring Uday and Qusay to trial to
face the memories of thousands of their Iraqi Sunnis, Shiites, and Kurdish victims.
2) On
Larry King Live, Iraq ’s US Civilian Administrator Paul Bremer told millions of viewers that “we
are effectively the only sovereign power in Iraq ”. This will not bode well for Iraqis, the Iraqi
Governing Council, or Arabs in the region. It translates into one word: occupation.
3) The
reports that Uday, Qusay, a bodyguard and supposed Qusay’s son, Mustafa died while fighting to the
last breath will not go down well with Iraqis. In fact, rather than demoralize Iraqi resistance, it
will light up the powder keg that is already brewing. US military sources said that 14-year old
Mustafa fought on and wounded several US soldiers even after everyone else in the house was killed.
Reports that the operation required 200 US soldiers and 20 missiles fired into the house to bring
down four Iraqis armed with machine guns will also likely embolden Iraqi resistance. On July 24, the
Arabiya news network broadcasted a video from a group calling itself the Iraqi Fedayeen of Anbar
Province who admitted that Uday and Qusay were killed but vowed to intensify their attacks on US
troops and send more of them back in body bags.
4)
US forces had no alternative but to publish the pictures of Uday and Qusay in the hopes of
convincing a highly sceptical Iraqi and Arab population of their demise. However, this puts the US
in an untenable situation: According to the Qur’an, the bodies of the dead, whether Muslim or
otherwise, guilty or innocent, cannot be put on display, cannot be handled inappropriately, and
cannot be brandished as proof or trophies of victory. The Muslim world has been watching carefully
to see what the US government has been doing with the bodies.
The
longer Iraqis are kept away from administering to themselves, governing themselves, and setting up
their own judicial and criminal justice system, the US will continue to alienate itself from a
population it promised to liberate
Firas
Al-Atraqchi holds an MA in Journalism and Mass
Communication. He is a Canadian journalist with eleven years of experience covering Middle East
issues, oil and gas markets, and the telecom industry. You can reach him at firas6544@rogers.com.