Home | Iraq in Transition

Updated:Tue. Mar. 21, 2006

 

Cradle of Civilization

The Invasion and Occupation of Iraq
A Reckless Military Adventure

By Jim Soffer
Guest Columnist - USA

10/01/2004 

The Great Synagogue (Slat li-Kbighi) was the oldest synagogue in Baghdad. Source: The Babylonian Jewry Heritage Center

The Iraqi regime under Saddam Hussein was responsible for the death and suffering of millions of people. For thirty-five years, the Iraqi people were brutally repressed, murdered and denied the most elementary form of justice. No person with any sense of justice or decency can mourn the demise of Saddam and his regime. What is dubious, however, is whether the price that the Iraqi people paid for Saddam’s removal, in lives, money and an uncertain future can be justified. What is contentious is whether the justification for the invasion by the US was based on manufactured evidence or factual data that Iraq was a threat to US national security. What should be questioned is the judgment and motivation of the leaders of a country to invade and occupy another country in a volatile region of the world, when the outcome of such an invasion and occupation is at best unpredictable and at worst will serve to dismantle that country and create great chaos in the region and around the world.

Eight months after the invasion and occupation, the people of Iraq are not better off. On the contrary, the invasion destabilized Iraq, causing various factions to maneuver for power and possible secession. Uncertainty prevails, and the foundation of the lives of the people has been shaken, not knowing whether they will become refugees in their own country. Any evidence to support the US administration’s allegations about weapons of mass destruction and Saddam’s ties to terrorists posing a threat to the US is non-existent. So what are the motivating factors that that set in motion one of the most reckless and dangerous military adventures of modern times?


Most Americans do not wish to impose their will on others nor do they want others to impose their will on them.


Most Americans are detached from the rest of the world and are not political. They cannot tell you the difference between Cairo and Istanbul, between Baghdad and New Delhi, between Algeria and Brazil. They do not wish to impose their will on others nor do they want others to impose their will on them. Americans are a compassionate and generous people who live by the principle of live and let live. The terrorist acts perpetrated against the US over the past 30 years, culminating in the despicable attack on the World Trade Center in New York, however, frightened the American people, and just as importantly disrupted their economic well being. Most Americans genuinely did not understand why such an act was committed. Tragically, there was an administration in place, with an ideological underpinning of molding the world in their own image and with an eye to get re-elected in an uncertain economic climate, to give the Americans people an answer by preying on their fears and on their prejudices.

In pursuit of their ideological convictions, the logical next step after the ouster of the Taliban in Afghanistan by the US was to exploit the tragedy of The World Trade Center and invade Iraq, under the guise of fighting terrorism. Saddam was the perfect personification of evil, presiding over an oil-rich country vital to the world’s economic well-being. He was an obstacle to general US interests in the region, including the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Saddam was the person who could be plausibly linked to terrorism and thus easily portrayed as a threat to the US. Ouster of Saddam, it was believed, and instituting some form of a democratic government in Iraq, would somehow change the political dynamics of the region; peace would prevail and an abundance of cheap oil would start flowing to jump-start failing economies for years to come. The difficulty with these perceptions is that they are shaped by cultural arrogance conceived out of extreme prejudice.

It is cultural arrogance, which necessarily dismisses other people’s interests and indeed humanity, that emboldened the world to impose the unconscionable thirteen years of draconian economic sanctions against Iraq and the subsequent invasion and occupation by the so-called coalition. The coalition, led by the US, thought the Iraqis would greet them as liberators, a regime friendly to the West would be installed, oil would flow and calm would prevail. An American with some cultural and political awareness, while hitting his forehead with the palm of his hand in bewilderment, very eloquently put it: “what were they thinking?!”


The rape of Iraq began over thirty years ago by Saddam and his henchmen.


The rape of Iraq began over thirty years ago by Saddam and his henchmen. It was continued by the repulsive sanctions instituted by the community of nations, which killed over a million Iraqis, and sustained by the oil-for-food program under United Nations auspices. The oil-for-food program administered by the United Nations was supposed to be a humanitarian act. In fact, the world needed oil, and the cheaper the better. Regardless, the United Nations, a supposedly neutral organization with an interest in world-peace and justice, robbed the Iraqi people of billions of dollars in “administrative” fees. Then came the invasion and the occupation. Leaders of the most powerful country in the world could not see beyond their arrogance and prejudices to perceive the danger to world stability that would result from an invasion of a pivotal country such as Iraq. “What were they thinking” still resonates in one’s mind. Iraq is not a homogeneous society. Ethnic and religious rivalries abound. No one in their right mind would dismiss the possibility of civil war and the dismantling of Iraq into three entities, and perhaps more. How this will affect regional stability and the well being of the Iraqi people and of the world at large is anyone’s guess.

The damage has been done. There is no going back. The people of Iraq, resourceful and industrious, however, should attempt to salvage what they can and perhaps turn the tide against the obvious and against all odds and dire predictions. They should begin this process by asserting their authority by way of the Iraqi Governing Council (IGC). The Iraqi Governing Council must take the first step by asserting sovereignty followed by abrogating all national debt incurred by the former regime as a way to demonstrate the Iraqi people’s rights and resolve. Further, they should demand the return of the billions of dollars that were shamelessly pocketed by the United Nations. Additionally, they must put all countries on notice that restitutions will be demanded from all countries that had illegally and immorally profited from the years in which the oil-for-food program was in effect. In order to regain some semblance of dignity, but also recognizing the reality of the occupation, the IGC should further demand that coalition forces remain in Iraq to assist in the security of the country until the IGC reconstitutes the Iraqi army, which was so ignominiously dismissed and humiliated. Finally, the IGC must demand that the chosen “viceroy” of the occupation should immediately cease to pompously parade around Baghdad in his designer suits and combat boots.

Iraq sits on the second largest proven oil reserves in the world. The Iraqi people should stand tall, hold their head high and start flexing their muscles for all to see that they are not a vanquished nation. Iraq’s rich history, it’s resourceful people and it’s God given natural resources must be aggressively affirmed in dealing with the rest of the world. Only then will the world be forced to acknowledge the great injustice perpetrated against the proud and great people of Iraq and leave them to independently sort and define their own destiny.

A personal note by the author of the article to the esteemed readers of IslamOnline:


Iraqi Jews, like all Iraqis, have a vast reservoir of pride in their identity, their country and their traditions.


I am certain that many of you who have read the opinions in the article may be wondering about my background, especially since my name is not of Arabic extraction. I am an Iraqi Jew (born in Baghdad) who left his country of Iraq at the age of two, after the creation of Israel. I grew up in Israel, Iran and finally moved to the US.

Leaving one’s homeland, however, did not mean that one forgot his roots or abandoned his identity. This is more poignant when one reluctantly leaves his homeland due to circumstances. So it was with many of the Arab Jews who left their countries after the creation of Israel. It was especially true of Iraqi Jews who, like all Iraqis, have a vast reservoir of pride in their identity, their country and their traditions. Iraqi Jews maintained these values by continuing to speak Arabic, eating Arabic food, listening to Arabic music (ohhh… Em Kalthoum), reading Arabic newspapers and even praying informally in Arabic and to Allah. They congregated together, prayed in traditional Iraqi synagogues and opened clubs exclusively for Iraqis. I for one, like the many friends and acquaintances that I have, speak Arabic with my mother, uncles, and other relatives and friends to this day. Since I never formally studied the language, my knowledge of Arabic is limited to simple conversations (but I do have a good accent). Nevertheless, the beauty and richness of the Arab culture resonates through the language.


Iraqi Jews continue to speak Arabic, eat Arabic food, listen to Arabic music, read Arabic newspapers and even pray informally in Arabic.


My father, Allah Yer Khamoo (May God have mercy on his soul), incessantly spoke about Iraq. He vividly detailed his life there, from fishing in the Tigris and having Samak Masgoof to serving in the Iraqi army. He spoke about his many Muslim friends and partners, and their relationships, and the mutual respect they had for one another. He also described some of the hardships of being a Jew in Iraq, especially the 1941 Rashid Ali pogroms. Yet, the impression was left that these were aberrations in an otherwise relatively peaceful coexistence. My parents instilled pride in us for being Iraqis, and if anything, saw western cultures as lacking solid roots, loyalty and dignity. They hoped and prayed that the rift caused by the creation of Israel, which sadly caused so much pain and suffering and fractured our relationships with our Arab brethren, will somehow come to pass.

I passed along the same stories and values to my children. I was not aware of the impact on them until my children grew up and started mimicking my Arabic phrases when I expressed anger at something or another (how can one demonstrate anger more expressively than in the Arabic language?). I was touched and joyful. But this joy paled in comparison to my euphoria when my daughter surprised me by informing me that she signed up for an Arabic course at the university. A year later, she was speaking the language in full sentences.

So dear readers, I am an Arab, Iraq is my country, and I am Iraqi in my soul and by birthright; and I am also Jewish. May the Almighty bless our country and our people and help us get through these difficult times so that we may reclaim our ancient glory and live in peace and harmony denied to our people for so many years.

Jim Soffer is an Iraqi Jew (born in Baghdad) who left Iraq at the age of two, after the creation of Israel. He grew up in Israel, Iran and finally moved to the US.


The articles posted on this page reflect solely the opinions of the authors.

News | Shari`ah | Health & Science | Politics in Depth | Reading Islam | Family | Culture | Youth | Euro-Muslims

About Us | Speech of Sheikh Qaradawi | Contact Us | Advertise | Support IOL | Site Map